![]() ![]() Runoff elections will happen faster - and could become harder to manage.The G.O.P.-led legislature is empowered to suspend county election officials.The secretary of state is removed as a voting member of the State Election Board.The Republican-controlled legislature has more control over the State Election Board.With an eye toward voter fraud, the state attorney general will manage an election hotline.Election officials can no longer accept third-party funding (a measure that nods to right-wing conspiracy theories).With a mix of changes to vote-counting, high-turnout elections will probably mean a long wait for results.If election problems arise, a common occurrence, it is now more difficult to extend voting hours.If you go to the wrong polling place, it will be (even) harder to vote.Offering food or water to voters waiting in line now risks misdemeanor charges.Early voting is expanded in a lot of small counties, but probably not in more populous ones.where you can vote) are essentially banned. It’s now illegal for election officials to mail out absentee ballot applications to all voters.There are strict new ID requirements for absentee ballots.Voters will now have less time to request absentee ballots.Here are the most significant changes to voting in the state, as written into the new law: Another provision makes it a crime to offer water to voters waiting in lines, which tend to be longer in densely populated communities.īelow is The Times’s analysis of the law, including the specific provisions and some struck-through language from the state’s previous voting legislation. The new law will, in particular, curtail ballot access for voters in booming urban and suburban counties, home to many Democrats. President Biden won the state by just 11,779 votes out of nearly five million cast. Republicans passed and signed the 98-page voting law last week following the first Democratic victories in presidential and Senate elections in Georgia in a generation. The New York Times has examined and annotated the law, identifying 16 provisions that hamper the right to vote for some Georgians or strip power from state and local elections officials and give it to legislators. The headline for the story is now ""UGA football program rallied in two incidents when players were accused of abusing women.Go page by page through Georgia’s new voting law, and one takeaway stands above all others: The Republican legislature and governor have made a breathtaking assertion of partisan power in elections, making absentee voting harder and creating restrictions and complications in the wake of narrow losses to Democrats. The paper acknowledged it fell short with the story and apologized to the university and its readers. "Connecting the sentences did not change the meaning of the quote, but the way it was presented to readers failed to meet AJC standards," the paper said in its story. It also says a quote used in the article from a police detective was also a combination of two statements made minutes apart. We identified errors that fell short of our standards, and we corrected them." "After receiving the university’s letter, we assigned our team of editors and lawyers to carefully review each claim in the nine-page document we received, along with some additional source material that supported the original story. "Our editorial integrity and the trust our community has in us is at the core of who we are," editor-in-chief Leroy Chapman said in a statement. The paper said that it found no evidence that Judd fabricated his claims but says it could not verify that 11 players accused of sexual assault were allowed to stay on the team. Wednesday, the AJC responded by announcing that they had fired Judd and made significant revisions to the story. A lawyer for UGA Athletics claimed that Judd's had a history of "biased and inaccurate" reporting about the football program. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |